Anova Precision Cooker 3.0 vs Anova Nano
The Anova Precision Cooker 3.0 ($169.00) runs at 1100 watts with WiFi and a display for baths up to about 12 quarts, while the Anova Nano ($68.00) runs at 750 watts over Bluetooth only for baths up to 8 quarts.
Anova Nano at $68.00 is less than half the price of Anova 3.0 at $169.00, and for a first circulator that lower price is the whole point: it lets you find out whether you actually like sous vide before spending more on a machine you might use twice and put in a drawer. The Nano is slower to bring a bath up to temperature and Bluetooth-only, which means the app only works within range of the unit itself rather than from anywhere with an internet connection. Anova 3.0 runs at a full 1100 watts, connects over WiFi so you can check a cook from another room or away from home, and handles a bath up to roughly 12 quarts rather than the Nano's 8, which matters once you are cooking for more than one or two people at a time.
How do they compare, side by side?
The Nano is not a crippled version of the 3.0 so much as a smaller machine built for a smaller bath. Power, connectivity and maximum bath size all scale down together, and the price drops by more than half to match. Both are made by Anova and share the same underlying app and recipe library, so switching between them, or eventually owning both for different jobs, does not mean relearning how to use a circulator from scratch.
| Spec | Anova Precision Cooker 3.0 | Anova Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $169.00 | $68.00 |
| Power | 1100 W | 750 W |
| Control | WiFi and app | Bluetooth only |
| Bath size | Full-size, roughly 12 qt | Up to 8 qt |
Does 750 watts versus 1100 watts actually matter?
It shows up mainly in how long the bath takes to come up to temperature, not in how well either one holds it. Anova Nano takes longer to bring a full pot of cold water up to a set point simply because it is pushing less power into it, which matters more if you tend to start a cook and want it ready quickly. Once either unit reaches its target temperature, both hold it just as precisely: 750 watts is plenty of power to maintain a steady bath, it is only the initial heat-up that is slower.
Does Bluetooth-only control matter day to day?
Anova Nano's Bluetooth connection only reaches the app while your phone is within range of the unit, generally the same room or close to it. Anova 3.0's WiFi connection lets you check on or adjust a cook from anywhere with an internet connection, including away from the house entirely. For a short cook you are going to be home for anyway, that difference rarely matters. For a long overnight brisket or a cook you want to check on from work, WiFi access is the more meaningful upgrade than the extra wattage.
What can you actually cook in an 8 quart bath?
Eight quarts sounds small next to a full-size 12 quart bath, but in practice it fits more than it seems. Two or three steaks, four to six chicken breasts, or a couple of pounds of vegetables all fit comfortably in Anova Nano's rated capacity, especially with EVERIE rack keeping bags upright and separated rather than stacked flat. Where the smaller bath genuinely runs out of room is cooking for a family of four or more at once, or working with a large cut like a whole pork shoulder or a big batch of ribs that needs more water volume around it to heat evenly. Anova 3.0's roughly 12 quart rating buys enough headroom for those bigger jobs without needing a second circulator or a second cook to fit everything in.
Which one should you buy?
Buy Anova Nano if this is your first circulator, you cook for one or two people, and you want to find out whether sous vide earns a permanent spot in your kitchen before spending more. At $68.00 it is a low-risk way in, and an 8 quart bath comfortably fits a couple of steaks or a chicken breast dinner. Buy Anova 3.0 if you already know you want to cook for a family, run baths larger than 8 quarts, or want to monitor an overnight cook from another room or away from home. The 1100 watt element and WiFi connection are worth the extra $101.00 once you are cooking at that scale regularly, and a container like EVERIE container kit, with its included divider rack, is worth pairing with either circulator for longer cooks or multiple bags at once.
Gear that fits these numbers
Everything mentioned on this page

Anova Precision Cooker 3.0
The default full size circulator: enough wattage to bring a 12 quart bath up quickly and hold it, with app control for long overnight cooks.

Anova Precision Cooker Nano 2.0
The cheapest way to find out whether you actually like sous vide. Slower to come up to temperature, and it holds a set point just as well once it gets there.

EVERIE 12 Quart Sous Vide Container Kit
Container, hinged lid, divider rack and insulating sleeve together. The sleeve matters more than it sounds: less heat leaving the walls means the element cycles less and holds tighter.

EVERIE Sous Vide Divider Rack
Keeps bags separated so water actually circulates between them. Stacked bags are the most common reason a cook comes out unevenly done.

ThermoWorks Thermapen ONE
One second and half a degree. On a page about pasteurization that accuracy is not a luxury, it is the difference between a figure meaning something and not.
Prices when last checked. They change often.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Anova Nano powerful enough for a full dinner?
Yes, for a household of one or two people the Anova Nano's 750 watts and 8 quart bath size are enough to cook a couple of steaks, chicken breasts or a similar portion at once. It simply takes longer to bring the bath up to temperature than the 1100 watt Anova 3.0, and it is not rated for baths as large as the full-size model.
Can the Anova Nano be controlled from outside the house?
No. The Nano connects over Bluetooth only, which requires your phone to be within range of the unit itself, generally the same room or nearby. The Anova Precision Cooker 3.0 connects over WiFi instead, which allows the app to reach the unit from anywhere with an internet connection, including away from home.
Does a lower wattage circulator cook food differently?
No, once a circulator reaches its set temperature, wattage does not affect how the food cooks: both machines hold a steady bath temperature equally precisely. Lower wattage only affects how long the bath takes to heat up from cold in the first place, and how quickly it recovers after the lid comes off to add or check on food, not the accuracy or consistency of the temperature once it gets there.
What size bath does the Anova 3.0 support that the Nano does not?
The Anova Precision Cooker 3.0 is rated for a full-size home bath of roughly 12 quarts, while the Anova Nano tops out around 8 quarts. The difference matters mainly for cooking multiple large cuts at once or for households of three or more; for one or two portions at a time, the Nano's smaller bath size is rarely a limitation.
Is it worth paying more for the Anova 3.0 over the Nano?
It depends on how much and how often you cook sous vide. If you already know you want to cook for a family, run larger baths, or check on long cooks remotely, the Anova 3.0's extra wattage and WiFi connection justify the higher price. If you are trying sous vide for the first time or usually cook for one or two people, the Nano covers the same core function for less than half the cost.
Do the Anova 3.0 and Anova Nano use the same app?
Yes, both circulators pair with the same Anova app and can access the same built-in recipes and guided cooks, which makes moving between the two, or eventually owning one of each for different bath sizes, straightforward. The app adjusts automatically to whichever circulator is connected, including recognizing the Nano's smaller maximum bath size when suggesting settings.
Sources
Published figures, quoted as published. We do not generate our own time and temperature data.
How we research: we compare manufacturer specifications, owner manuals, published USDA and FSIS figures and recurring themes in verified owner reviews. We do not cook test batches or run instruments, and nothing here is professional food safety advice. When a figure is not published by a source we trust, we say so rather than estimate one.